Fu, Y. Exploration of collagen recovered from animal by-products as a precursor of bioactive peptides: Successes and challenges. / Y. Fu, M. Therkildsen, R.E. Aluko [et al.] // Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. – 2019. – V. 59. – № 13. P. 2011-2027. DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2018.1436038.
Horner, K. Bioavailability of milk protein-derived bioactive peptides: A glycaemic management perspective / K. Horner, E. Drummond, L. Brennan // Nutrition Research Reviews. – 2016. – V. 29. – № 1. – P. 91-101. DOI: 10.1017/S0954422416000032.
Górska-Warsewicz, H. Food Products as Sources of Protein and Amino Acids-The Case of Poland / H. Górska-Warsewicz, W. Laskowski, O. Kulykovets, [et al.] // Nutrients. – 2018. – V. 10. – № 12. – P.1977. DOI: 10.3390/nu10121977.
Schutz, Y. Protein turnover, ureagenesis and gluconeogenesis // International journal for vitamin and nutrition research. – 2011. – V. 81. – № 2-3. – P. 101-107. DOI: 10.1024/0300-9831/a000064.
Gorissen, S. Protein Type, Protein Dose, and Age Modulate Dietary Protein Digestion and Phenylalanine Absorption Kinetics and Plasma Phenylalanine Availability in Humans / S. Gorissen, J. Trommelen, I. Kouw [et al.] // The Journal of nutrition. – 2020. – V. 150. – № 8. – Р. 2041-2050. DOI: 10.1093/jn/nxaa024.
Santana Luz, A.B. What are the digestion and absorption models used to reproduce gastrointestinal protein processes? A protocol for systematic review / A.B. Santana Luz, R.O. de Araújo Costa, G. de Medeiros [et al.] // Medicine. – 2021. – V. 100. – № 30. – P. e26697. DOI: 10.1097%2FMD.0000000000026697.
Kim, D.Y. A neural circuit mechanism for mechanosensory feedback control of ingestion / D.Y. Kim, G. Heo, M. Kim [et al.] // Nature. – 2020. – V. 580. – № 7803. – P. 376-380. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2167-2.
Yılmaz, C. Neuroactive compounds in foods: Occurrence, mechanism and potential health effects / C. Yılmaz, V. Gökmen // Food Research International. – 2020. – V. 128. – P. 108744. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108744.
Bertechini, A.G. Apparent total tract and ileal amino acids digestibility values of vegetal protein meals with dietary protease to broiler diet / A.G. Bertechini, F.S. Dalolio, J.C. Carvalho [et al.] // Translational Animal Science. – 2020. – V. 4. – № 4. – P. txaa219. DOI: 10.1093/tas/txaa219.
Ravindran, V. Progress in ileal endogenous amino acid flow research in poultry // Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology. – 2021. – V. 12. – P. 1-11.
Chernukha, I.M. Evolution of in vitro digestibility techniques: a systematic review / I.M. Chernukha, A.V. Meliashchenia, I.V. Kaltovich E.R. [et al.] // Theory and practice of meat processing. – 2021. – V. 6. – № 4. – P. 300-310. DOI: 10.21323/2414-438X-2021-6-4-300-310.
Покровский, А.А. Атакуемость белков пищевых продуктов протеолитическими ферментами in vitro / А.А. Покровский, И.Д. Ертанов // Вопросы питания. – 1965. – № 3. – С. 38-44.
Pokrovskii, А.А. Pokrovskiy, A.A. Atakuyemost' belkov pishchevykh produktov proteoliticheskimi fermentami in vitro [Susceptibility of nutritional proteins to proteolytic enzymes in vitro] / А.А. Pokrovskii, I.D. Ertanov // Voprosy Pitaniia. – 1965. – № 3. – P. 38-44.
Василевская, Е.Р. Биоконверсия in vitro: сравнение мультиферментных систем INFOGEST 2.0 и протокола Покровского-Ертанова / Е.Р. Василевская, М.А. Арюзина, А.Г. Ахремко // Все о мясе. – 2022. – № 6. – С. 44-49. DOI: 10.21323/2071-2499-2022-6-44-49.
Biokonversiya in vitro: sravneniye mul'tifermentnykh sistem INFOGEST 2.0 i protokola Pokrovskogo-Yertanova [In vitro bioconversion: comparison of multi-enzyme systems INFOGEST 2.0 and Pokrovkiy-Ertanov protocol] / E.R. Vasilevskaya, М.А. Aruzina, А.G. Аkhremko // Vsyo o myase. – 2022. – № 6. – P. 44-49. DOI: 10.21323/2071-2499-2022-6-44-49.
Sousa, R. Protein digestion of different protein sources using the INFOGEST static digestion model / R. Sousa, R. Portmann, S. Dubois [et al.] // Food research international. – 2020. – V. 130. – P. 108996.
Vasilevskaya, E.R. Study of the functional product’s protein compounds digestion features / E.R. Vasilevskaya, A.G. Akhremko, E.K. Polishchuk [et al.] // Theory and Practice of Meat Processing. – 2020. – V. 5. – № 3. – P. 18-21. DOI: 10.21323/2414-438X-2020-5-3-18-21.
Ansia, I. Nutrient digestibility and endogenous protein losses in the foregut and small intestine of weaned dairy calves fed calf starters with conventional or enzyme-treated soybean meal / I. Ansia, H.H. Stein, C. Brøkner [et al.] // Journal of Dairy Science. – 2021. – V. 104. – № 3. – P. 2979-2995. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2020-18776.
Moughan, P.J. Amino acid digestibility and availability in foods and feedstuffs / P.J. Moughan // Proceedings of the 9th international symposium on digestive physiology in pigs, 2003. – P. 199-221.
Gelberg, H.B. Comparative anatomy, physiology, and mechanisms of disease production of the esophagus, stomach, and small intestine / H.B. Gelberg // Toxicologic Pathology. – 2014. – V. 42. – № 1. – P. 54-66. DOI: 10.1177/0192623313518113.
Kaminsky, L.S. The small intestine as a xenobiotic-metabolizing organ / L.S. Kaminsky, Q.-Y. Zhang // Drug Metabolism and Disposition. – 2003. – V. 31. – № 12. – P. 1520-1525. DOI: 10.1124/dmd.31.12.1520.
Reed, K.K. Review of the gastrointestinal tract: from macro to micro / K.K. Reed, R. Wickham // Seminars in Oncology Nursing. – 2019. – V. 25 – № 1. – P. 3-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2008.10.002.
Thummel, K.E. Enzyme-catalyzed processes of firstpass hepatic and intestinal drug extraction / K.E. Thummel, K.L. Kunze, D.D. Shen // Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. – 1997. – V. 27. – № 23. – P. 99-127. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-409X(97)00039-2.
Rao, J.N. Intestinal Architecture and Development / J.N. Rao, J.-Y. Wang // In Regulation of Gastrointestinal Mucosal Growth. – San Rafael (CA): Morgan & Claypool Life Sciences, 2010. – 220 p.
Collins, J.T. Anatomy, Abdomen, Small Intestine / J.T. Collins, S.S. Bhimji // Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, 2017. – 540 p.
Tortora, G.J. Principles of anatomy and physiology / G.J. Tortora, B.H. Derrickson // Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons, 2008. – 87 p.
Reinus, J.F. Gastrointestinal anatomy and physiology: the essentials / J.F. Reinus, D. Simon // Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2014. – 60 p.
Shroyer, N.F. Anatomy and physiology of the small and large intestines / N.F. Shroyer, S.A. Kocoshis // In Pediatric Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease. – Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier, 2011. – Р. 324-336.
Krüger, P. Metabolism of boswellic acids in vitro and in vivo / P. Krüger, R. Daneshfar, G.P. Eckert [et al.] // Drug metabolism and disposition. – 2008. – V. 36. – № 6. – P. 1135-1142. DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.018424.
Luo, Z. Ex vivo and in situ approaches used to study intestinal absorption / Z. Luo, Y. Liu, B. Zhao [et al.] // Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods. – 2013. – V. 68. – № 2. – P. 208-216. DOI: 10.1016/j.vascn.2013.06.001.
Jung, S.M. In vitro models of the small intestine for studying intestinal diseases / S.M. Jung, S. Kim // Frontiers in Microbiology. – 2022. – V. 12. – P. 4102. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.767038.
Vasilevskaya, E.R. Research methodology of Sus scrofa tissue extracts protein-peptide components / E.R. Vasilevskaya, E.A. Kotenkova, E.A. Lukinova [et al.] // Theory and practice of meat processing. – 2017. – V. 2. – № 3. – P. 79-85. DOI: 10.21323/2414-438X-2017-2-3-79-85.
Li, L. Proteome profiles of digested products of commercial meat sources / L. Li, Y. Liu, G. Zhou [et al.] // Frontiers in Nutrition. – 2017. – V. 4. – P. 8. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2017.00008.
Wen, S. Discrimination of in vitro and in vivo digestion products of meat proteins from pork, beef, chicken, and fish / S. Wen, G. Zhou, S. Song [et al.] // Proteomics. – 2015. – V. 15. – № 21. – P. 3688-3698. DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201500179.
Mészáros, P. Investigation of Intestinal Absorption and Excretion of Paracetamol in Streptozotocin-Induced Hyperglycemia / P. Mészáros, S. Kovács, G. Kulcsár [et al.] // International Journal of Molecular Sciences. – 2022. – V. 23. – № 19. P. 11913. DOI: 10.3390/ijms231911913.
Kiela, P.R. Physiology of Intestinal Absorption and Secretion / P.R. Kiela, F.K. Ghishan // Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology. – 2016. – V. 30. – № 2. – P. 145-159. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2016.02.007.
Boyd, B.J. Successful oral delivery of poorly water-soluble drugs both depends on the intraluminal behavior of drugs and of appropriate advanced drug delivery systems / B.J. Boyd, C.A.S. Bergström, Z. Vinarov [et al.] // European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. – 2019. – V. 137. – P. 104967. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2019.104967.
Nunes, R. Tissue-based in vitro and ex vivo models for intestinal permeability studies / R. Nunes, C. Silva, L. Chaves // In Concepts and Models for Drug Permeability Studies. – Elsevier. – 2016. – P. 203-236.
Chen, M.-Ch. A review of the prospects for polymeric nanoparticle platforms in oral insulin delivery / M.-Ch. Chen, K. Sonaje, K.-J. Chen [et al.] // Biomaterials. – 2011. – V. 32. – № 36. – P. 9826-9838. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.087.
Renukuntla, J. Approaches for enhancing oral bioavailability of peptides and proteins / J. Renukuntla, A.D. Vadlapudi, A. Patel [et al.] // International Journal of Pharmaceutics. – 2013. – V. 447. – № 1-2. – P. 75-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.02.030.
Patel, G. Oral Delivery of Proteins and Peptides / G. Patel, A. Misra // In Challenges in Delivery of Therapeutic Genomics and Proteomics. – Elsevier. – 2011. – P. 481-529.
40. Xie, Y. Real meat and plant-based meat analogues have different in vitro protein digestibility properties / Y. Xie, L. Cai, D. Zhao, H. Liu, X. Xu, G. Zhou, C. Li // Food Chemistry. – 2022. – V. 387. – Article № 132917. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132917.